Search found 2 matches
Return to “An Optimal Aggro Deck”
- Sat Sep 14, 2013 4:36 pm
- Forum: Strategy and Theory
- Topic: An Optimal Aggro Deck
- Replies: 12
- Views: 9961
- Thu Sep 12, 2013 10:13 pm
- Forum: Strategy and Theory
- Topic: An Optimal Aggro Deck
- Replies: 12
- Views: 9961
Interesting article; thanks for the link.
One thing I found odd is actually right at the beginning. His third best deck "had a 21st City of Brass instead of the 11th Putrid Leech". That seems like a very strange trade-off -- increase the land count while simultaneously lowering your curve. Any thoughts on why that would be? I can't think of any possible advantage you'd have doing that, which makes me question his methods (though they seem pretty rigorous).
I'm glad he went into detail on the mulligans. That was a very smart approach he took and led to some interesting conclusions.
One thing I found odd is actually right at the beginning. His third best deck "had a 21st City of Brass instead of the 11th Putrid Leech". That seems like a very strange trade-off -- increase the land count while simultaneously lowering your curve. Any thoughts on why that would be? I can't think of any possible advantage you'd have doing that, which makes me question his methods (though they seem pretty rigorous).
I'm glad he went into detail on the mulligans. That was a very smart approach he took and led to some interesting conclusions.