Search found 483 matches
Return to “[Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT”
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:38 pm
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
[Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
It's almost 2021, I haven't played MtG in years and I don't know why I'm posting here.
- Mon Sep 28, 2015 6:18 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
[Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
Lurkers be lurkin
- Thu Jul 16, 2015 7:22 pm
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Thu Apr 30, 2015 1:09 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Mon Apr 27, 2015 7:48 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Fri Apr 24, 2015 4:56 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Fri Feb 20, 2015 5:32 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Tue Jan 27, 2015 1:58 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Tue Jan 20, 2015 12:09 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Tue Jan 20, 2015 12:01 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Wed Jan 07, 2015 7:21 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Thu Jan 01, 2015 7:05 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
GP Manila in 2 days. Any significant name here? http://www.cleventsgp.com/preregistered
- Thu Dec 25, 2014 6:54 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Mon Dec 15, 2014 10:37 pm
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Sat Dec 13, 2014 3:08 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:18 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Wed Dec 03, 2014 6:49 pm
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Sun Nov 30, 2014 5:53 pm
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Sun Nov 30, 2014 3:12 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Fri Nov 28, 2014 3:50 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Thu Nov 27, 2014 4:07 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Thu Nov 27, 2014 12:00 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Wed Nov 26, 2014 4:55 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Sun Nov 16, 2014 4:32 pm
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Tue Nov 11, 2014 12:07 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Mon Nov 10, 2014 11:49 pm
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Mon Nov 10, 2014 10:45 pm
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
I have to add that proper communication is key to avoid these misunderstandings. Whenever I come across this scenario, I will always confirm with the opponent when he is trying to cast the kill spell.
Me: Ok, moving to combat/declare attackers.
Him: I'll kill your Rabblemaster first.
Me: When are you doing this, before he is making the token in the main phase? Or during combat when his ability is on the stack?
Him: Before the token is produced.
Me: So it is still the main phase correct?
Him: Yes.
Me: Ok, so your spell resolves. It's still the main phase so I cast a Rabblemaster. Go to combat?
Him: Hey, isn't your combat done? You already entered combat.
Me: No, I didn't. You stopped me before we could enter combat. I even confirmed with you if it's still the main phase.
It's only scummy if you're not communicating your intentions properly.
Example 1:
Me: Declaring attackers?
Him: Kill your Goblin before it produces a token.
Me: Haha! The ability is on the stack so you can't stop it.
Him: No, I kill it before it's ability is even triggered.
Me: Sorry, you already let me go to the beginning of combat.
Example 2:
Me: Going to combat.
Him: Kill Rabble before his trigger.
Me: Hmn, ok. I'll cast another Rabblemaster then.
Him: But you're already entering combat.
Me: It's still main phase.
Example 1 is just wrong because you are making the opponent lose priority. Example 2, while technically correct, is demonstrating a lack of communication between players.
Me: Ok, moving to combat/declare attackers.
Him: I'll kill your Rabblemaster first.
Me: When are you doing this, before he is making the token in the main phase? Or during combat when his ability is on the stack?
Him: Before the token is produced.
Me: So it is still the main phase correct?
Him: Yes.
Me: Ok, so your spell resolves. It's still the main phase so I cast a Rabblemaster. Go to combat?
Him: Hey, isn't your combat done? You already entered combat.
Me: No, I didn't. You stopped me before we could enter combat. I even confirmed with you if it's still the main phase.
It's only scummy if you're not communicating your intentions properly.
Example 1:
Me: Declaring attackers?
Him: Kill your Goblin before it produces a token.
Me: Haha! The ability is on the stack so you can't stop it.
Him: No, I kill it before it's ability is even triggered.
Me: Sorry, you already let me go to the beginning of combat.
Example 2:
Me: Going to combat.
Him: Kill Rabble before his trigger.
Me: Hmn, ok. I'll cast another Rabblemaster then.
Him: But you're already entering combat.
Me: It's still main phase.
Example 1 is just wrong because you are making the opponent lose priority. Example 2, while technically correct, is demonstrating a lack of communication between players.
- Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:36 pm
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
If you're playing at competitive REL, I will assume you know the rules and any issue you raise will have to fall on the judge's ears. Also, it's only scummy if you're confusing your opponent. As long as you communicate clearly what you're going to do, the judge will be always on your side (and have always been at my side whenever this issue comes up).
Also, it tilts them a little bit, so it's definitely advantage.
Also, it tilts them a little bit, so it's definitely advantage.
- Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:04 pm
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
I'll quote you on this in the future if there is an argument. However, I won't say it to that particular person I'm discussing with because he has this idea of a "end of main phase 1" period that I don't know where he got.Once your opponent does something, the shortcut is null and void and you play on from that point as though the shortcut was never declared.
- Mon Nov 10, 2014 2:53 pm
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
Except the shortcut for declaring attackers according to the MTR is "offer to pass priority until opponent gets it in the beginning of combat step". I think most players only know "go to declare attackers step" and not the intricacies of the shortcut.You aren't wrong, Christen. If one player requests a shortcut and the other takes an action, the first is not required to continue passing priority. The game state has changed and may be reevaluated. What cannot be done is suggesting a shortcut, the opponent agreeing, and then trying to back out of it. Personally, I prefer suggesting a move to the beginning of combat step instead of declare attackers for better clarity, especially with things like Rabblemasters or Mutavaults on the board (I tend not to animate until beginning of combat). LD, it isn't scummy at all. From a tactical standpoint, it just means that he wants a Rabblemaster on the board when combat starts. He isn't trying to be deceptive in the slightest. When his opponent takes an action, he gets to decide if he wants to continue with the shortcut or not.
Fuck it, I'll just revert back to actually asking if the opponent is okay with us ending the main phase and going to combat whenever Rabblemaster is involved.
- Mon Nov 10, 2014 1:54 pm
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Mon Nov 10, 2014 11:08 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Fri Nov 07, 2014 12:30 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Wed Nov 05, 2014 11:42 pm
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Sun Nov 02, 2014 3:55 pm
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
I'm pretty sure there are others. I'm also pretty sure Skyrim is one of the inspirations of this block (around the same time the game came out when this was in development? or maybe I just screwed up the dates). I expected the dragons to come up in the third block, but looks like we're getting it early.What is it with the "dragons used to exist, then they went away, and now they're coming back" storyline, anyway?Dragons seem to be coming earlier than expected?
1. ASOIAF
2. Dragon Age
3. Skyrim
4. Khans of Tarkir
5. Others?
- Sun Nov 02, 2014 6:18 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Sat Nov 01, 2014 1:10 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Fri Oct 31, 2014 3:56 pm
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Fri Oct 31, 2014 5:28 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490
- Thu Oct 30, 2014 2:48 am
- Forum: Fires of Salvation
- Topic: [Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
- Replies: 59962
- Views: 8517490