KrajfactorialJesus Christ, you're going to be this site's Kraj.You just can't keep your hands off me.I jailed Manders N1
But seriously, was that because you didn't trust me or because you did and wanted to protect me?
I thought you were the most obvious town and I was looking to prevent a NK.
He is, absolutely, the only person who's ever been able to read me with any kind of accuracy. That man can see through me in ways I never thought were possible. And I have no idea how (other than we've spent a LOT of time chatting in the past and have played a fair amount of game together.) But he's impressively accurate.
Search found 34 matches
Return to “WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)”
- Fri Nov 06, 2015 7:57 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
- Thu Nov 05, 2015 10:55 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
- Thu Nov 05, 2015 5:47 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2
I jailed Manders N1
- Thu Nov 05, 2015 4:05 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
- Thu Oct 29, 2015 6:44 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
- Thu Oct 29, 2015 6:34 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2
I think it may be time to pull the plug on this one.
- Mon Oct 26, 2015 5:03 am
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2
I'd still like to play it out
- Sun Oct 25, 2015 8:02 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2
Anyone left in this game?
- Sun Oct 18, 2015 9:38 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2
V/LA until Tuesday morning, I'm traveling to/from Texas to visit friends.
- Fri Oct 16, 2015 11:58 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2
All hail glorious admin
- Fri Oct 16, 2015 1:19 am
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2
I don't know what to make of the Pedro/Red finger-pointing yet, but I think a mass claim is unwise given how little information we have and how much information it gives the scum team.
- Thu Oct 15, 2015 5:30 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2
Red's reaction appears town to me, but I don't like his refusal to provide any details.
Manders: It's too early to think about what?
Manders: It's too early to think about what?
- Thu Oct 15, 2015 3:04 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2
Can your power be verified?
- Wed Oct 14, 2015 4:00 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2
unvote while this all plays out.
- Wed Oct 14, 2015 4:02 am
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
What's your strong case on Red?T/S list :
Town :
rezombad
Manders
Ham
Null :
MoJo
Tordeck
Well, their lack of activity (like mine I know) made them almost unreadable, I will try to analyse their posts with the new events from D1/N1
Scum
RedNihilist
Not only because he got pretty aggressive with me but I have a strong case on him. He probably killed Stardust.
- Tue Oct 13, 2015 7:02 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2
I don't know why Stardust would have used his 8 ball ability on a random player in the opening posts of a new game. He's not around to explain himself, but I've seen his role PM and it lines up with the flavor that he used in the MoJo vote. It's all I have to go on from him, so I'm looking at the available evidence.
Whenever I've received a mafia ability with a caveat or restriction, the mod has included it in my role PM. If our mod designed and balanced the game such that Stardust's role as written is possible and balanced, who are we to question it? The original sign-up thread said that there was a non-zero chance of the setup being bastard. My worry is that the scum team is very powerful, given Stardust and GR's role PMs. Why not give scum a double vote as a way to blend in?
Whenever I've received a mafia ability with a caveat or restriction, the mod has included it in my role PM. If our mod designed and balanced the game such that Stardust's role as written is possible and balanced, who are we to question it? The original sign-up thread said that there was a non-zero chance of the setup being bastard. My worry is that the scum team is very powerful, given Stardust and GR's role PMs. Why not give scum a double vote as a way to blend in?
- Tue Oct 13, 2015 6:44 am
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2
Yes, GR and Stardust had powerful town roles, so a powerful scum role seems appropriate to me.
What do you think?
What do you think?
- Tue Oct 13, 2015 2:26 am
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
I'm not sure why Manders and Tordeck are so against a MoJo vote. Stardust singling him out with an 8ball ability strikes me as the explanation that doesn't require any ridiculous WIFOM.Stupid "Submit" button!
Pedro, explain the post quoted above.
Ham, mind giving me your general idea on this situation?
I'm not a great mafia player, so I try to stick with simple explanations and reasons for my voting. Thus I believe Stardust got an answer that caused him to vote MoJo. Stardust was town, so his motivation (a town victory) is the same as mine, so I'll go with that until someone else gives me a more compelling reason to switch my vote.
- Mon Oct 12, 2015 1:40 am
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
- Sun Oct 11, 2015 10:45 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2
We know that Hunt was town, and Stardust's role PM says that he will have a 50% chance to receive a truthful answer. In the other case, he'll receive an indecisive answer.
If Stardust asked the mod about Huntzilla's alignment, he would have a 50% chance to get the answer. I assume he's smart enough to ask questions where a yes/no answer would leave no ambiguity.
If Stardust asked about Hunt and got a truthful answer, he would know that he was either town, scum, or not-town or not-scum.
Later Stardust says that Huntzilla's "meta checks out" using the same metaphor.
I assume that in the days between him getting Hunt to L-2 and that post, he would decide that lynching a townie was a bad idea if he had a truthful result on him.
QED he didn't have a truthful result on him.
If Stardust asked the mod about Huntzilla's alignment, he would have a 50% chance to get the answer. I assume he's smart enough to ask questions where a yes/no answer would leave no ambiguity.
If Stardust asked about Hunt and got a truthful answer, he would know that he was either town, scum, or not-town or not-scum.
If whatever he checked actually gave him a truthful result, he wouldn't have voted for Hunt.Oh yeah, do that. I checked what I needed to check and it checked out.Claim in your next post Hunt.
Later Stardust says that Huntzilla's "meta checks out" using the same metaphor.
It took him a few days to read Hunt's Sally mafia meta.Ok, sweet, thanks. Meta checks out, Huntzilla is acting out his scum game. I want to quickly answer outstanding questions, then will finish this Day.
I assume that in the days between him getting Hunt to L-2 and that post, he would decide that lynching a townie was a bad idea if he had a truthful result on him.
QED he didn't have a truthful result on him.
- Sun Oct 11, 2015 9:37 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2
Manders:
Are you asserting that Stardust used his 8 ball on Huntzilla, and the MoJo crumb was just a fakeout?
Are you asserting that Stardust used his 8 ball on Huntzilla, and the MoJo crumb was just a fakeout?
- Sun Oct 11, 2015 6:05 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2
Manders:
I don't think Stardust could have convinced us to vote kpaca based on his near-absence of posting and a D1 8ball claim.
I certainly wouldn't have believed him, given that I voted him and kept my vote there all day.
I don't think Stardust could have convinced us to vote kpaca based on his near-absence of posting and a D1 8ball claim.
I certainly wouldn't have believed him, given that I voted him and kept my vote there all day.
- Sun Oct 11, 2015 5:21 am
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2
vote MoJo
- Sun Oct 11, 2015 5:19 am
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
- Sun Oct 11, 2015 1:37 am
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2
Why aren't we lynching kpaca?
- Sat Oct 03, 2015 5:10 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 1
It's possible from the OP, and I got my role and alignment. Hunt getting what he wanted isn't unusual from my POV.
- Mon Sep 28, 2015 6:08 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
- Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:40 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 1
Manders:
I didn't unvote because I wanted to see who would continue to discuss you claiming. L-2 is safe, especially during RVS where nobody is going to hammer you without a claim. If someone else got you to L-1 I would have unvoted you, but I didn't have to and nobody took the scum bait.
I didn't unvote because I wanted to see who would continue to discuss you claiming. L-2 is safe, especially during RVS where nobody is going to hammer you without a claim. If someone else got you to L-1 I would have unvoted you, but I didn't have to and nobody took the scum bait.
- Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:25 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
- Fri Sep 25, 2015 10:53 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 1
Wagons are more fun than non-wagons
- Fri Sep 25, 2015 10:49 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 1
Unvote
Vote Stardust
Vote Stardust
- Fri Sep 25, 2015 10:49 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
- Thu Sep 24, 2015 10:21 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 1
RVS claims are silly, stop being silly dudes.
- Tue Sep 22, 2015 5:38 pm
- Forum: Completed Games
- Topic: WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)
- Replies: 360
- Views: 141975
WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 1
Vote Manders because female privilege