you can get to FNM but you're fat enough to need special accommodations regarding seating, so about 4 billsHow fat?you're a fat guy who likes mathOoh, ooh do my name next!
next question
next question
Moderator: redthirst
Well, what did you expect? I only have 2 modes: All or Nothing.I did.You find my Facebook or something?Yup, it's completely yoursA 'K' justI always assumed K(C)haos Pawn since Khao isn't a thing and, as such, would have trouble spawning anything.
seems stronger than a 'C' I think. Plus, my middle name starts with a K so there's that too.
I dunno, the word just came to me one day years ago and I dug it, so I started using it. It's completely mine and I like it.
(dear god you sweet soul never google Khaospawn)
It's just as unfiltered as you are here.
In a pinch, Khaos' beard can help turn this around.
I rarely skip a Khaospawn wall of text because I know there is always piss at the end of the rainbow.
Will you admityou can get to FNM but you're fat enough to need special accommodations regarding seating, so about 4 billsHow fat?you're a fat guy who likes mathOoh, ooh do my name next!
next question
next question
Not yet, but I will make it happen within the next five minutes.Val, are we FB homies?
Everyone's a winner, we're making our fame,1 - Drunk, surly zem
2 - Nice, modest zem
3 - Bragpost zem
4 - Confident and funny zem
5 - Condescending jerk zem
6 - Self-aware zem
It's one of three tier 1 decks; though it's substantially less forgiving than the other two.So, Standard Burn is where it's at?
Everyone's a winner, we're making our fame,1 - Drunk, surly zem
2 - Nice, modest zem
3 - Bragpost zem
4 - Confident and funny zem
5 - Condescending jerk zem
6 - Self-aware zem
It's one of three tier 1 decks; though it's substantially less forgiving than the other two.So, Standard Burn is where it's at?
Mkay, mkay. If I wanted to win consistently and not flop to bad draw luck, what would I play?I'd call it tier 1.5. It's good against the top decks, but you lose to randomness and have an overall low power level which does not a tier 1 deck make.
It's not that the draws are inconsistent, it's that the deck is very unforgiving with scrys and burning creatures vs. players at the wrong times.It's one of three tier 1 decks; though it's substantially less forgiving than the other two.So, Standard Burn is where it's at?Mkay, mkay. If I wanted to win consistently and not flop to bad draw luck, what would I play?I'd call it tier 1.5. It's good against the top decks, but you lose to randomness and have an overall low
power level which does not a tier 1 deck make.
Very high and mighty for a player that's rage quit on me twice.IDk, Vidi went 6-3 losing to the mirror, something random, and mono-green agro dudes(aka something random). The actual quote:
Me: Day 2?
Vidi: Fuck no. Lost mono-green witchstalkers, arbor colossus and shit.
Also, Friday conversation when we're just hanging out bullshitting. Kibler just announces that "I play 13 basics and have fucking lifegain in my board. Eat that burn players."
Everyone's a winner, we're making our fame,1 - Drunk, surly zem
2 - Nice, modest zem
3 - Bragpost zem
4 - Confident and funny zem
5 - Condescending jerk zem
6 - Self-aware zem
I played Vidi in the mirror at GP Phoenix. Really cool guy. Game 1 both of us had to mull to 5 so we spent a few turns playing draw go.IDk, Vidi went 6-3 losing to the mirror, something random, and mono-green agro dudes(aka something random).
It was mostly just casual shit-talk. I was actually surprised at how funny BK is. He has a legitVery high and mighty for a player that's rage quit on me twice.IDk, Vidi went 6-3 losing to the mirror, something random, and mono-green agro dudes(aka something random). The actual quote:
Me: Day 2?
Vidi: Fuck no. Lost mono-green witchstalkers, arbor colossus and shit.
Also, Friday conversation when we're just hanging out bullshitting. Kibler just announces that "I play 13 basics and have fucking lifegain in my board. Eat that burn players."
Chandra is WAAAAAY shittier with counterspells than keranos, she's also hard to protect in a control shell, and her +1 basically isn't useful, and you never ever want to tap out for her since the most she'll do in a control deck the turn she comes down is kill an x/1Keranos is slow, but he is designed appropriate to his colors...he offers card advantage and VCA/damage, but with the red "randomness" of relying on the topdeck. It's actually a strong set of effects in combination with a scry-heavy deck design; if you can control your top card before the reveal, then you get to choose drawing an extra card or delivering a bolt nearly every turn. But at 5CMC he doesn't get going until T6, so you would have to be controlling the board in order to put him to use. I want to like him in a Grixis shell given all the low-cost removal and burn, but the lack of a full-on black sweeper by T4 weakens the plan. UWR will therefore be the likely call, with counters, bounce and burn into Verdict, then Keranos to run away with CA.
But arguably one could play the same strategy with Chandra and it's not being done (though she's a lot easier to remove than a god at present), so the overall viability of such a strategy in the current meta is debatable.
Return to “Fires of Salvation”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests