Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 8:48 am
Why?
Dude I know, right?I was surprised you even had a facebook.
Dies to Removal
Another Dead MTG Board
http://diestoremoval.com/forums/
[Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
Page 412 of 1500
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 9:14 am
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 9:37 am
I do have a social life I swear.
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 9:38 am
You didn't strike me as the type to like, advertise said social life. Shit, you use Facebook more than I do, and I'm a homosexual with social networking needs.
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 9:46 am
Using this thread as an OoS dump. Get shat on.
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 9:47 am
Looks good
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 10:07 am
Actually, it kinda looks like Alex...at least in his prince form...
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 11:40 am
His power level is over 9,000!Actually, it kinda looks like Alex...at least in his prince form...
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:32 pm
What, 9000?!?!
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:35 pm
*power reader breaks*
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:38 pm
http://magic.tcgplayer.com/db/deck.asp?deck_id=1161622
Mono White Weeenieweeenieweeenie 1st.
Actually there was a tournament, where there werer 3 KAMAHL CONTROLS in top 8. I was like WTF IS THIS GUY REALLY ONTO SOMETHING? Then I checked other decklists. Well, someone tried to play a Sledgehammer but failed terribly. 3 copies of Purphoros as Sledge is obviously a deck that does only care about card's price tag - not their effectivness. Lack of 1CMC drops. As overall, construction looked pretty damn weak.
And it was still 3rd.
Mono White Weeenieweeenieweeenie 1st.
Actually there was a tournament, where there werer 3 KAMAHL CONTROLS in top 8. I was like WTF IS THIS GUY REALLY ONTO SOMETHING? Then I checked other decklists. Well, someone tried to play a Sledgehammer but failed terribly. 3 copies of Purphoros as Sledge is obviously a deck that does only care about card's price tag - not their effectivness. Lack of 1CMC drops. As overall, construction looked pretty damn weak.
And it was still 3rd.
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:41 pm
I wonder if Japan has states (prefectures?)? I'm currently 35th in my prefecture.
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:43 pm
2 Gideons?http://magic.tcgplayer.com/db/deck.asp?deck_id=1161622
Mono White Weeenieweeenieweeenie 1st.
Ohmygawd.
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:44 pm
"You think you can get away with playing 1 baddie? Fuck you, let's play 2 baddies."
Also, I think 1-2 Purphoros in Red Devotion Wins might be a real Magic: The Gathering card. Not 30$ good, but just... being good, doing some work.
Also, I think 1-2 Purphoros in Red Devotion Wins might be a real Magic: The Gathering card. Not 30$ good, but just... being good, doing some work.
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:48 pm
Zem's Pyromaster list made Top 4...http://magic.tcgplayer.com/db/deck.asp?deck_id=1161622
Mono White Weeenieweeenieweeenie 1st.
Actually there was a tournament, where there werer 3 KAMAHL CONTROLS in top 8. I was like WTF IS THIS GUY REALLY ONTO SOMETHING? Then I checked other decklists. Well, someone tried to play a Sledgehammer but failed terribly. 3 copies of Purphoros as Sledge is obviously a deck that does only care about card's price tag - not their effectivness. Lack of 1CMC drops. As overall, construction looked pretty damn weak.
And it was still 3rd.
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:48 pm
I'd probably play 1 Purphorous honestly.
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:49 pm
I think it's too slow."You think you can get away with playing 1 baddie? Fuck you, let's play 2 baddies."
Also, I think 1-2 Purphoros in Red Devotion Wins might be a real Magic: The Gathering card. Not 30$ good, but just... being good, doing some work.
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:49 pm
I don't think that word means what you think it means, zeman.
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:50 pm
On a side note: I think I'm in love with JS' new avatar.
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:52 pm
The mushroom cloud is appropriate because he's in Japan...
Too soon?
Too soon?
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:53 pm
Lulz. Thanks Rebros.
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:53 pm
1 Purphorous in devotion red, where everything is RR or more should be ok (I think).
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:55 pm
It seems decent in the control matchup as an extra mana sink, as well as adding to the relevance of your 'bad' topdecks.
@red: Arguably the most offensive thing you've ever said. Forever too soon
@red: Arguably the most offensive thing you've ever said. Forever too soon
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:57 pm
Yeah... "it should be ok"...
Now you're starting evaluating Purphoros, tomorrow you'll start thinking about its interaction with YP, then you'll splash white for Assemble the Legion and before knowing what happened you'll be splashing black in order to play Purge the Profane.
Now you're starting evaluating Purphoros, tomorrow you'll start thinking about its interaction with YP, then you'll splash white for Assemble the Legion and before knowing what happened you'll be splashing black in order to play Purge the Profane.
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:57 pm
That's a thing I could do!
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:59 pm
PurgethePurphoros.dec
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:00 pm
You'll have Kamahl as a guest on your stream talking about 3-color devotion interations.
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:01 pm
And how the two life from Purge shores up the weak Aggro MU... because everyone knows Aggro players can't count to 22 unless they have a couple of extra fingers/toes.
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:03 pm
Which it's likely they do, because Aggro is the only deck easy enough to pilot that even inbred mutants can do it.
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:04 pm
That's where this Purphoros road leads, zeman.
Tread it carefully.
Tread it carefully.
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:04 pm
I can't count to 22. Sorry to disappoint.
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:05 pm
Can't wait.
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:11 pm
That's gonna take a huge dose of GoLytely or ExLax...PurgethePurphoros.dec
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:11 pm
2+2=22???
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:36 pm
Oh my gods. It doubled!2+2=22???
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:37 pm
I should make a new signature now that Knight and Arostocrat have rotated out, but I loves them too much.
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:42 pm
So no one drops?1 Purphorous in devotion red, where everything is RR or more should be ok (I think).
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:44 pm
I know right, how did it do that??Oh my gods. It doubled!2+2=22???
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:46 pm
I feel like there should at lest 4 one drops.So no one drops?1 Purphorous in devotion red, where everything is RR or more should be ok (I think).
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:53 pm
I don't see a reason not to play 8. Improves the control matchups, which are the deck's weak point.I feel like there should at lest 4 one drops.So no one drops?1 Purphorous in devotion red, where everything is RR or more should be ok (I think).