

FoS but no vote on Yanni.Ugh, not even two pages in and it's already time for the shitty player or scum game. Posts like "oh boy" and "srs bzns" are just the worst. Unless you have a posting restriction that demands you post drivel let's try to be productive. Scum doesn't catch itself.
fos: CM & Yanni
I'm trying to wrap my head around this post. Phantom calls out imopen2 for something I would've voted him for (naked voted + amidoingitright). He even calla out Manders about asking for a soft claim, which, from what I can tell, is pointless, but not malicious. But then after all that, he places his vote on a lurker. What is up?The notion of RVS is moronic. It makes the thread longer and it's not like those posts won't be reviewed in later days. Every posts in a game of mafia matters. You say you spam because "lolrvs", but you don't get to tell us your motives. I've said my
piece, I thoroughly believe that you're wrong, and I ESPECIALLY think it's scummy to defend posting drivel. If you don't have some reads by page two you're playing a different game than I am, and your game sounds worse.
Thus far things of interest:
Yanni's initial rhyming post, accompanying a vote- Important to note, though possibly nothing. Any comments, Yanni?
Mogadishu jones' vote everyone- A bit out of character for him, but I don't generally try to game the player. In my mind this is akin to gaming the mod. I haven't exactly read a lot of his games either.
"is this what townies do? Can I be town"- not very natural. fos: imopen2. Another bad or scum dilemma.Seems rather early to be voting for people but what do i know?
Vote: Captain Murphy
amidoingthisrite?
Manders asking for a soft-claim and then asking about what to soft claim, as has been stated, is very suspicious. The inquiry as to what to soft
claim sounds like she's trying to get another player to reveal something, however I don't see what relevant information she could acquire. We'll see how this one plays out.
Still no word from killjoy or teef.
It occurs to me that Ximbad is the only player in the game that I would expect to know what he's doing while basically posting nothing. I would like to know more about everything I commented on, but what Ximbad didn't say feels the most relevant to me.
unvote: the guardian
vote: ximbad
No, impoen pretty much has this right.Interesting post. Only members of the mafia know to a certainty how many of them there are. I would assume 2-3, but I have no reason to believe one number over the other. You're absolutely a suspicious character thus far and this post helps you none. It's also laughable that your claim against me is that I don't definitively believe you to be scum. As per your request you're officially ahead of Ximbad on the list.So you fos me but you think ximbad and yanni are the scum?
EXPLOSIVE MANDERSLike, seriously, you guys actually thought I had a NEFARIOUS PLOT in mind behind asking about a soft claim?
GTFOOH.
(Get The Fuck Out Of Here for anyone who doesn't know.)
Though this post by Teefo makes sense.Seems like a dumb way to stimulate discussion and just points a massive glowing neon sign at you.Because I'm just stimulating discussion?Why, Manders, do you want a soft-claim? And after suggesting it, why not go specific with what your idea of a soft claim might be?
I know nothing of Adventure Time.
If you have no idea about adventure time then a
soft claim would be completely pointless, so why do it? I don't understand your reasoning.
I don't like the idea of soft claiming or any claiming at all this early in the game for no reason, kind of feel like it is a bit disrespectful to the game mod.
I don't like the vote, but I'mI don't think that being aggressive is scummy, especially on day 1. On the contrary, I assume mafia will try to start the game with a low profile. Sure, experienced players may tap on that, but in that case I will say it's a null tell.
On the other hand, that "tag-team" accusation, to call it that, is making my "spider-sense" tingle.
Vote: imopen2
One more thing I need to know before I proceed.It seems really odd that you're pushing for Guardian's lynch and saying absolutely nothing (that I've seen) about Ximbad, when, even with your PoE, it's either Ximbad and you, or Ximbad and Guardian.
In other words, your decision to vote Guardian over Ximbad makes no sense.
Pages 1 - 3 and pages 18 - 21.One more thing I need to know before I proceed.It seems really odd that you're pushing for Guardian's lynch and saying absolutely nothing (that I've seen) about Ximbad, when, even with your PoE, it's either Ximbad and you, or Ximbad and Guardian.
In other words, your decision to vote Guardian over Ximbad makes no sense.
How much of this thread have you read?
Okay then.Pages 1 - 3 andOne more thing I need to know before I proceed.It seems really odd that you're pushing for Guardian's lynch and saying absolutely nothing (that I've seen) about Ximbad, when, even with your PoE, it's either Ximbad and you, or Ximbad and Guardian.
In other words, your decision to vote Guardian over Ximbad makes no sense.
How much of this thread have you read?
pages 18 - 21.
I don't have the time to fully commit to the game, but I still want to know what's up with your vote.
I'm not making you do a goddamn thing.That's not an answer.
All I want is an answer, regardless of whether it's already in the thread or not. You know I don't have much time to commit, yet you're purposefully making me have to go and re-read.
Page 18 was where you were spamming (mostly) Guardian quotes. From what I've seen, you've said almost nothing about Ximbad. On top of that, the only dichotomy is between you and Guardian.
Nobody's posting, not even the replacement.
Ximbad/Manders, final answer. I'm out.
Vote Ximbad
I believe you words implied here said that you cemented Ximbad as my scum buddy, unless Jones was REALLY pulling one over on you. What would make you change tomorrow from Xim to Jones/Dies that hasn't been said already?I'm not making you do a goddamn thing.That's not an answer.
All I want is an answer, regardless of whether it's already in the thread or not. You know I don't have much time to commit, yet you're purposefully making me have to go and re-read.
Page 18 was where you were spamming (mostly) Guardian quotes. From what I've seen, you've said almost nothing about Ximbad. On top of that, the only dichotomy is between you and Guardian.
Nobody's posting, not even the replacement.
Ximbad/Manders, final answer. I'm out.
Vote Ximbad
You said you read
it, and you just showed you did.
I already told you that the ONLY thing I have on Ximbad is PoE, and that is based on me thinking YOU are town.
Therefore, why the fuck would I vote Ximbad over The Guardian, who I showed evidence to support a theory of being scum?
Answer me that, and maybe I'll continue thinking you're town.
As of now, I'm not so sure about Ximbad.
Also, if you've decided it's me and Ximbad, why did you vote him? Why not vote me? You know, SINCE I ALREADY HAVE A VOTE ON ME AND THIS GAME/DAY HAS GONE ON FUCKING FOREVER AND PUTTING A VOTE ON HIM IS JUST RETARDED AS FUCK.
Can you tell me that, hon?
That explains why people keep coming over for chicken nuggets
It's the principle of POA (Process of Elimination).I don't know about lynching Ximbad yet. I just don't see a solid case for that. I don't like the whole I don't claim thing from Manders, because as much as she claims to be misleading Mafia, the town was also being misled. I just don't know how a vanilla gets info about being targeted, specially in a basic, but you guys have more experience than me. In other words, I don't fully trust Manders and would support that lynch. Now that DSM is providing some more content, I can at least put something else on my spreadsheet other than "counterclaimed ( N_S )".
Let's hear from teefo, then.
Мы, темнотеwho the fuck is kpaca?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests