Page 40 of 169
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:36 pm
by Tom Servo
Side note: Did you guys know that I was turned down for staff a couple years ago because I was involved in a secret plot to take down MTGS? No seriously, they said I was part of a small group of people looking to destroy MTGS......to the people that came up with that one:

My point, people talk a lot of shit outside the forums and unless I am told about that stuff or it's posted somewhere, I can't see it. And some of it is just bat shit crazy. So, yeah...
That has to be the funniest thing I've read all day. I imagine Betty White as some sort of terrorist sleeper agent in a dark room somewhere plotting against Sally.
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:42 pm
by Slammu
3. You were banned on MTGS and now try to get back at Gal by any methods..
Aside from the other things that you said that weren't true, this is bizarrely untrue. And so easily verifiable that is hard to understand why you would say it...
Harkius
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:18 pm
by Yannaria
guys the best conspiracies come from Google.com/news
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:40 pm
by Kaitscralt
Harkius got banned on Salvation
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:44 pm
by Yannaria
hahahhahaha
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:59 pm
by Second Harkius
shatters gonna shat
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:51 pm
by ExarionUniverse1
Originally Posted by Galspanic
O-o made a threat against a member of the MTG community and is banned. He is also banned member RustedKnight/Crumpet/CorrodedTemplar.
RustedKnight's ban for suspension evasion (with gimmicks CorrodedTemplar, Crumpet, O-o) has been reduced to a one-month suspension starting today. He'll be back on February 22.
After Feb 22 you can ask him for details, but it is related to some of our new policies.
This is just me trying to figure out what got Onar so upset.
3. You were banned on MTGS and now try to get back at Gal by any methods..
Now other issues : If Shakalo wants to appeal , I give the iridium my assurances as I did for Yanni that he will follow rules. Please convey to staff Gal and Boub.
Harkius is banned? News to me.
Out of curiosity, Onar... I haven't seen you on MTGS in forever and have never heard anything from you about any of this. You did something for Yanni? This is news to me. But if you are doing something (you guys talk all cryptic like here sometimes) please make sure I've at least heard of it. Thanks.
I relayed your message for him to appeal , and Gal , I reside daily in clans
as all the clans can confirm as Russian Alara. You even deleted my bad joke , and while I don't have access to staff meetings , a lot of the clans are in staff , and since you wish to I inform you of my efforts, I will daily.
and with that: What is your opinion on making appeals public?
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:54 pm
by iamabadman
I am such a hardcore hacker...
{overly excited internet kid .meme}
That I don't know what SQL Dumps are.
(Oh and that stuff I just said is a super high level mod lounge leak but I'm pretty sure I was vague enough and it's 3 years old, so I can say it. My point is just that people do really silly things and build up all sorts of levels of paranoia off site)
Only off-site, eh? Xp
Careful there, Gals. Telling Baguy you like him is the first step in Going Gutter. We've already got Sene.
we're already exchanging nudes

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:58 pm
by Tom Servo
nudes heal all wounds
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:26 pm
by ( G_R )
Noodles
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:35 pm
by Galspanic
I relayed your message for him to appeal , and Gal , I reside daily in clans as all the clans can confirm as Russian Alara. You even deleted my bad joke , and while I don't have access to staff meetings , a lot of the clans are in staff , and since you wish to I inform you of my efforts, I will daily.
and with that: What is your opinion on making appeals public?
Cool. I realize that my message might have sounded like "who the hell is this guy?" but I really didn't know what you were talking about. If you were somehow a factor in this whole thing I had no idea... just needed to know, so thanks. No need to inform me if you don't want to... it's your prerogative.
Public Appeals: I can see ups and downs, but I dont like the idea in general. Mob justice isn't really my thing and a lot of the appeals deal with some pretty iffy stuff that is best kept private (names, addresses, etc.). If other are gung ho about it, I won't fight it though.
we're already exchanging nudes

I was going to post a picture of some random hairy fat guy here and say it was me. I hate Google right now.
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:53 pm
by iamabadman
I was going to post a picture of some random hairy fat guy here and say it was me. I hate Google right now.
so you were going to try and catfish me, with my own pics. classy mtgsilly mods

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:02 am
by ExarionUniverse1
I relayed your message for him to appeal , and Gal , I reside daily in clans as all the clans can confirm as Russian Alara. You even deleted my bad joke , and while I don't have access to staff meetings , a lot of the clans are in staff , and since you wish to I inform you of my efforts, I will daily.
and with that: What is your opinion on making appeals public?
Cool. I realize that my message might have sounded like "who the hell is this guy?" but I really didn't know what you were talking about. If you were somehow a factor in this whole thing
I had no idea... just needed to know, so thanks. No need to inform me if you don't want to... it's your prerogative.
Public Appeals: I can see ups and downs, but I don't like the idea in general. Mob justice isn't really my thing and a lot of the appeals deal with some pretty iffy stuff that is best kept private (names, addresses, etc.). If other are gung ho about it, I won't fight it though.
we're already exchanging nudes

I was going to post a picture of some random hairy fat guy here and say it was me. I hate Google right now.
and about unbanning Shakalo and Kpaca ?
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:06 am
by Galspanic
What about those?
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:25 am
by Yannaria
dose nuts
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:26 am
by ExarionUniverse1
What about those?
Do you support unbanning them , and if you don't and they still are, would you reconcile with them?
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:32 am
by Galspanic
My opinion on those is not ready for public display yet. I don't think it's appropriate for my to discuss that outside of the Appeals threads. Sorry, but I don't want to put anyone in a more awkward position than they already might be.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:37 am
by ExarionUniverse1
My opinion on those is not ready for public display yet. I don't think it's appropriate for my to discuss that outside of the Appeals threads. Sorry, but I don't want to put anyone in a more awkward position than they already might be.
I understand.
I just want to state that these questions will come up , when you are deciding on your views for appeals.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:46 am
by Galspanic
What questions? Whether people think people should be banned or not? I feel like I'm missing something here.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:47 am
by ExarionUniverse1
What questions? Whether people think people should be banned or not? I feel like I'm missing something here.
your history with them can decide your vote.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:51 am
by Galspanic
Not a question.

Are you asking if my experiences with these two users will sway my decision with them?
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:01 am
by Kaitscralt
I think this thread is an open book.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:23 am
by Manders
Public Appeals: I can see ups and downs, but I don't like the idea in general. Mob justice isn't really my thing and a lot of the appeals deal with some pretty iffy stuff that is best kept private (names, addresses, etc.). If other are gung ho about it, I won't fight it though.
Wouldn't it be pertinent to allow the one appealing their ban/suspension to decide whether to do so in public or not?
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:28 am
by Galspanic
No idea. I tend to be pretty bad at seeing long term implications of things and rely on others for that. My gut says, "fuck it, go long!" all the time so I am a bit reserved about saying much about it. The reason I am not for Public Appeals in the abstract is that people seem to have confused "Transparency" with "sniffing the dirty underwear in the hamper." Like, explaining actions is one thing but putting yourself and your process out there 100% isn't good for things... at least I've never seen it work.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:32 am
by Mcdonalds
No idea. I tend to be pretty bad at seeing long term implications of things and rely on others for that. My gut says, "fuck it, go long!" all the time so I am a bit reserved about saying much about it. The reason I am not for Public Appeals in the abstract is that people seem to have confused "Transparency" with "sniffing the dirty underwear in the hamper." Like, explaining actions is one thing but putting yourself and your process out there 100% isn't good for things... at least I've never seen it work.
by Public, do you mean by the community in general is allowed to chime in or simply revealing the appeals thread (I assume) for public viewing?
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:36 am
by Kaitscralt
Galspanic, by public appeals I assumed people meant that maybe just the people involved would be allowed to sit in.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:42 am
by Galspanic
Find me another site that does this and I will be glad to look it over. I'd like to see how it actually functions first. Cool?
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:47 am
by Kaitscralt
Are you responding to me? I am hoping you are talking to someone else because your post is snarky and full of sarcasm, and that certainly does not make sense because you are the one who has said twice on this page that you are open to the idea of public appeals if everyone else was. So I was joining the conversation based on the positive feedback you had been providing.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:51 am
by Second Harkius
Find me another site that does this and I will be glad to look it over. I'd like to see how it actually functions first. Cool?
no other sites give enough of a shit, i'd imagine
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:52 am
by Galspanic
Are you responding to me? I am hoping you are talking to someone else because your post is snarky and full of sarcasm, and that certainly does not make sense because you are the one who has said twice on this page that you are open to the idea of public appeals if everyone else was. So I was joining the conversation based on the positive feedback you had been providing.
I was, but no snark meant at all. The idea of having appeals be public is pretty out there to me. In theory there is a lot that could go wrong with it. I really have no idea so I want to see another site where it has worked in practice, not theory. I've spent a lot of time looking at how other sites work and have seen things that do and do not work. So, instead of making
my mind up on pure theory I want to just see how it works.
I've said I am open to the idea if everyone else wanted it, but then I thought I was being asked right now what I thought... so, to answer that question I need more information. That's all.
no other sites give enough of a shit, i'd imagine
20 other forums tell me this might be the truth. But, simply torching users does seem to be against the current ethos of the admins and staff.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:56 am
by Kaitscralt
So, are you actually asking for people to give you examples of something when you know damn well that Salvation is the only website in the history of forums that has a structure even similar to this entire process? There is no other website with public appeals because there is no other website with appeals, and you know that, and asking me to find them for you was the sarcastic snarky part of your post.
Sometimes I think you're bi-polar or something, Galspanic. I offered you a harmless idea based on what you have been saying here, and your response was a shitty one.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:59 am
by Second Harkius
Madding, he meant no harm. That would require a firm stance which is against the ethos of the current administration and staff.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:01 am
by Second Harkius
Madding, he meant no harm. That would require a firm stance which is against the ethos of the current administration and staff.
If my post was snarky (it was), it's only because I really think the folks at Sally can't exist without at least some on-going drama to fuel their sense of purpose. I mean without summits and private appeals then you'd be forced to read every mod lounge thread or something

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:03 am
by Sir Sapphire the 3rd
Good thing none of us have Facebook accounts, that's where the real drama goes down.
Then your bad at facebooks
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:05 am
by Kaitscralt
Madding, he meant no harm. That would require a firm stance which is against the ethos of the current administration and staff.
If my post was snarky (it was), it's only because I really think the folks at Sally can't exist without at least some on-going drama to fuel their sense of purpose. I mean without summits and private appeals then you'd be forced to read every mod lounge thread or something

Or make the website better.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:08 am
by Galspanic
So, are you actually asking for people to give you examples of something when you know damn well that Salvation is the only website in the history of forums that has a structure even similar to this entire process? There is no other website with public appeals because there is no other website with appeals, and you know that, and asking me to find them for you was the sarcastic snarky part of your post.
Sometimes I think you're bi-polar or something, Galspanic. I offered you a harmless idea based on what you have been saying here, and your response was a shitty one.
Something similar, yes? We are unique in a lot of ways but I assume that somewhere out there someplace does public appeals of some sort. And I assume that you guys go other
places online and maybe saw something. Really I just want information so I'm not just theorycrafting a potentially big thing. I didn't know that there aren't other sites with appeals. Most, however, just tell you to contact an Admin... but after that I have no idea what happens. We mention appeals in our rules, but it would be easy enough to miss if you were just skimming.
You offered what I thought was a legitimate suggestion, thought I was being a dick, and I just said that I wanted to see examples before I could make an informed decision. I hardly see how that's a shitty response. My gut says that public appeals are a terrible idea because they feel like private matters that aren't really a Colosseum event and I've never seen anything anywhere else to prove me wrong on that. Again, I don't like making informed opinions when I don't feel like I have enough information. I can pull an answer out of my ass but I know that it would be taken as something more than something I pulled out of my
ass.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:10 am
by Kaitscralt
Well, now you know it was a shitty response because there are no appeals on the internet aside from your website and no one is going to look for examples so we can forgive and forget and move on with the topic that you and Onar were talking about in the first place and I merely joined in because it smelled like progress for a second.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:10 am
by Kaitscralt
Or we can talk about something else.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:12 am
by Second Harkius
All of these posts are about 1900 words too short. Step it up, fellows.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:15 am
by Second Harkius