Posted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 3:01 am
it's a lot more damaging personally than not using a pronoun you prefer people address you with!
yes but it was funny like a clownidk have you or anyone you've been close to been raped?
remember when i got banned for typing 'no' in the speakeasy
i think it's idiotic that the penalties on mtgs are of inverse proportion to how much they affect people in real life.Rape at MTGS? huh.
I have not looked at this issue, but it seems that with all the blah blah blah mtgs mods are too heavy handed around here, you might be fine with a mod not being heavy handed of sorts. Or is it a: you have dumb rules so you might as well stick to them in every case thing?
I'm so tempted to put this in my signaturei think you have to have been raped at some point in your life to appreciate wrestling
his son looks traumatized
We didn't get to see it but that's because WWE knows that match will headline a PPV someday.Gonna be awesome. I really just want to see Bryan vs. Ambrose.Daniel Bryan against The Shield in a gauntlet match
I was going to post a response to this along the lines of "Truth's a fallacy now, eh?" but while typing it I had andude that's like the ultimate fallacy in combatting rape culture by telling people to get raped and don't fall into that just because xenphire is an inexcusable pile of garbage of a human being.Wow, really? I wake up to this steaming pile?
Okay, the rape debate ends thusly:
Unless you've been raped, you cannot comprehend how bad it is to read the word. So Xenphire/Chaotix's choice is thus: infract; or get raped.
Queen to A1. Checkmate.
And yet the waves wash away the message.
Oh no. That's not the point at all. Yes, the water will wash away the image, but that is God's love, washing away the writer's moment of weakness... professing love is nothing but a whisper against the crashing waves.And yet the waves wash away the message.
Water hates god.
Or its waters way of saying fuck off.Oh no. That's not the point at all. Yes, the water will wash away the image, but that is God's love, washing away the writer's moment of weakness... professing love is nothing but a whisperAnd yet the waves wash away the message.
Water hates god.
against the crashing waves.
I regret only 2 things.On a long enough timeline, you will regret everything you've ever done.
Salvation a la mode and a cup of tea.
I think what you're not getting about the issue is that allowing discussion of rape in a structured atmosphere is also heavy-handed. There is no spectrum here; either someone forcefully penetrated you or they did not.. we have words like "bad touch" to handle anything else. So the iridium has to make a choice: either infract, to protect those who have suffered, or don't. By allowing it they are heavy handed and corrupt,Rape at MTGS? huh.
I have not looked at this issue, but it seems that with all the blah blah blah mtgs mods are too heavy handed around here, you might be fine with a mod not being heavy handed of sorts. Or is it a: you have dumb rules so you might as well stick to them in every case thing?
I actually had this discussion with [redacted] not very long ago. All discussion of religion on Sally is inherently flawed: one of the most powerful tools open to the believer is the path of emotion, and you can't drive that wagon there. If you truly wish to convert, you need to show grace, and getting yelled at while keeping your composure is one of the best ways to do that... but you can't get someone to show you their mask-less self there without that person getting infracted, and that smashes directly against the empathy the religion engenders. The end result is a useless apologeticism, and Debate should have been outright destroyed a long time ago... I would have considered itOr its waters way of saying fuck off.Oh no. That's not the point at all. Yes, the water will wash away theAnd yet the waves wash away the message.
Water hates god.
image, but that is God's love, washing away the writer's moment of weakness... professing love is nothing but a whisper against the crashing waves.
And now we have the B Movie "Scumbag's List"I actually had this discussion with [redacted] not very long ago. All discussion of religion on Sally is inherently flawed: one of the most powerful tools open to the believer is the path of emotion, and you can't drive that wagon there. If you truly wish to convert, you need to show grace, and getting yelled at while keeping your composure is one of the best ways to do that... but you can't get someone to show you their mask-less self there without that person getting infracted, and that smashes directly against the empathy the religion engenders.Or its waters way of saying fuck off.Oh no. That's not the point at all. Yes, the water will wash away the image, but that is God's love, washing away the writer's moment of weakness... professing love is nothing but a whisper against the crashing waves.[/quote:
2ekqtkd7]
And yet the waves wash away the message.
Water hates god.
The end result is a useless apologeticism, and Debate should have been outright destroyed a long time ago... I would have considered it the penultimate use of my career there to have done so, even at the cost of my job. In fact, I was very close to bringing that subject up to 'Spirit, possibly days away, but then the whole Gutter holocaust happened.
echoing this, rape is a pretty traumatic and difficult to discuss event in a structured, serious environment, and it's a pretty heavy topic even without the fear that you're going to offhandedly trigger someone who has been a victim. allowing people to casually make jokes about the topic (in this case, it was a joke about prison rape without explicitly using the word rape but with prison sodomy) is not something you can do in "good humor" unless you're a professional comedian, and even among 99% of those individuals, the topic is not handled in a manner that really gives the subject matter the justice it deserves (AFAIK, Louis C.K. is the only comedian I've heard to date who has done a routine addressing rape and rape culture without violently throwing up all over theI think what you're not getting about the issue is that allowing discussion of rape in a structured atmosphere is also heavy-handed. There is no spectrum here; either someone forcefully penetrated you or they did not.. we have words like "bad touch" to handle anythingRape at MTGS? huh.
I have not looked at this issue, but it seems that with all the blah blah blah mtgs mods are too heavy handed around here, you might be fine with a mod not being heavy handed of sorts. Or is it a: you have dumb rules so you might as well stick to them in every case thing?
else. So the iridium has to make a choice: either infract, to protect those who have suffered, or don't. By allowing it they are heavy handed and corrupt, and even having the discussion is pretty low of them.