Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:01 pm
I'm off the opinion that you only need 2 mutavaults as you're already threat dense in the dual colored agro decks such as this *shrug*
No need for Godless Shrine without Boros Reckoner. If you're wanting an extra black source, try Overgrown Tomb since you can cast BTE with it.[Deck]Creatures:26
4 Rakdos Cackler
4 Stromkirk Noble
4 Ash Zealot
4 Burning-Tree Emissary
4 Chandra's Phoenix
4 Falkenrath Aristocrat
2 Thundermaw Hellkite
Spells:11
4 Pillar of Flame
4 Searing Spear
3 Brimstone Volley
Lands:23
4 Blood Crypt
4 Dragonskull Summit
11 Mountain
1 Godless Shrine
3 Mutavault
Sideboard:15
3 Dreadbore
2 Rakdos's Return
2 Ratchet Bomb
4 Boros Reckoner
2 Chandra, Pyromaster
2 Olivia Voldaren
[/deck]
This list trims the black splash to a minimum, which removes Spike Jester but gives access to Boros Reckoner out of the sideboard. No guildgates here, so more reliable buddy lands.
Mutavault at 3 still gives some fun manland goodness but hedges against drawing them in multiple. 1 Godless Shrine gives
us a little extra black without screwing with Reckoner. 19 red sources is enough for Ash Zealot.
Legion Loyalist is gone but Ratchet Bomb in the sideboard gives some game against hexproof and tokens.
2 Hellkite for reach and 23 land to cast them reliably.
BTE gives us pseudo-haste if we have a spear or pillar in hand. It chains effectively into Chandra's Phoenix or a turn 3 Ash Zealot if you draw the 3rd colored land.
I think you're right. I decided to drop Olivia to make room for skull crack. Olivia Voldaren is a very powerful card, but she doesn't fit into the blitzkrieg racing plan of the 22 land list.This was one of my concerns for the 22 land decks.
Especially when we have black splashes and the mana intensive Olivia.
Felt the same so I'm running 2 T-maws and 24 lands to be on the safe side though you could run 23 if your ok with possibly casting them later.For what it's worth, I like the older version of the deck better after testing a bit.
I think we should leave the super-aggro strategy to mono R and Blitz.
Try it before you knock it. I've played Dos Rakis since it's inception and I absolutely loved AristocratFirst let’s go over Doomblade. After playing last week I realized how good Doomblade would have helped in my matches. Most of the best creatures *the ones that gives us the most problems* in the Standard are non-black creatures. A lot of these creatures come out pretty early and act as annoying road blocks for our ground pounders. Because of that I think it should be a main deck card. The only question now is Dreadbore still worth running on the side? This one might vary from meta to meta.
I still don’t think Exava is better than Aristocrat. And Hellrider in this deck seems like a mistake. I haven’t play tested them myself lately but let’s go over the pros and cons of each creature...
Pros
Falkenrath: 4 power; 4 Mana; haste; has flying; Sac outlet
ability is very important; When there are other creatures on the battlefield, she’s very hard to deal with; Can pump herself up; Non-Legendary.
Exava: 4 Mana; 4 power/toughness; First Strike; Dodges plenty of removal; Hard to block.
Hellrider: 4 Mana; 3/3, haste; can make you faster in the right conditions; Ability will make your crappy creatures to be able to deal damage; Ability stacks.
Cons
Falkenrath: has trouble with lingering souls and other annoying x/1 token flyers; very vulnerable when its by itself; Not very good defensively.
Exava: No flying; Ability that grants creatures haste is not relevant; Legendary creature; Not very good defensively.
Hellrider: Very easy to block. Can be killed very easily by cheap removal. needs lots of creatures to work at its best. Not as good as the other two when working alone.
I’ve done testing with Hellrider before, and he was good. The problem with him is that our deck isn’t as swarmy as some of the other decks, and often times he ended up being
underwhelming. I had to get real lucky to get that magical 4th turn kill draw. I Haven’t play tested Exava all that much to be honest but she has a lot less going for her than Falkenrath does on paper. Also, Hellkites are just too good not to run. It is the Ace of Spades in the deck. If there is one thing people hate most about this deck is a 4th turn Risto followed by a 5th turn Dragon. Part of the main reason why they are so much better is because they have flying.
Cutting out both Aristocrat and Hellkite in favor of Hellrider and Exava just seems like a big mistake to me. The deck is still can still be strong but it loses out on so much power. I truly believe that Falkenrath is the main reason this deck works. She was built for this deck. She is the reason why Green needs Thragtusk to have any chance. She’s the one that will give our opponents nightmares. She is the real deal.
It's funny that you mention that because I typed up an entire diatribe on considering MAINDECKING KoI over Spike Jester due to how bad these matchups are for us, but then I realized I'd only be harming almost all of my other matchups in doing so and withdrew the idea. There's really not much room in my sideboard for this guy unfortunately, so if he were to be in my 75 he'd be in the main. He's just suboptimal against Jund and Naya Blitz, the former because we have to race Jund before they can stabilize (and do enough damage before we land Burning Earth so that it becomes a wincon) and the latter due toI know he's old, but could Knight of Infamy coming in from the board be an answer to the paladin?